Some additional insights for CNA's documentary 'How politics is behind Malaysia's education reform difficulties'

Introduction

The CNA documentary 'How politics is behind Malaysia's education reform difficulties' sheds light on the multifaceted challenges plaguing the Malaysian education system. While it rightly identifies the impact of politics on policy-making, the documentary falls short in fully elaborating on the issues that were stated in the video. From the burdensome non-teaching responsibilities imposed on teachers to the misconceptions about recent policy changes like the abolition of UPSR, these systemic challenges extend beyond the surface-level analysis offered. A deeper exploration reveals how administrative duties, misguided blame on exam abolitions, and infrastructural constraints, compounded by political influences, continue to stifle meaningful progress in delivering quality education.

Other that that, the CNA documentary on the Malaysian education system raises some pertinent points, but unfortunately, it falls short of capturing the authentic voice of those at the heart of the system—current government school teachers. This is the thing that I notice throughout watching this video. Despite featuring a retired teacher and private school educators, it fails to encompass the lived realities faced by teachers in public schools, thereby providing a limited view of the challenges in our education system. It's understandable why government school teachers are absent from the conversation, as civil servants face restrictions from speaking to the media. However, this omission narrows the narrative and leaves the public with an incomplete picture of our education landscape. Therefore, this article is to shed light on some of those missing perspectives.

The Burden of Non-Teaching Duties

One of the documentary's key shortcomings is its failure to delve deeply into the burdens placed on teachers in the current system. Educators in government schools are overwhelmed by various non-teaching responsibilities mandated by the Ministry of Education (MOE) and their own school management. These duties encompass organizing school programs, paperwork, keying in student marks, and chaperoning students for extracurricular competitions. Such tasks significantly reduce the time teachers can dedicate to personalized teaching and learning, which hampers their ability to implement effective differentiation strategies.

Differentiated instruction is vital for catering to the diverse learning needs of students. However, with the heavy administrative load placed on teachers, there is little room left for developing customized teaching materials or adapting lessons to suit individual students. As a result, teaching often defaults to a one-size-fits-all approach, which fails to meet the varied needs of learners. While MOE and educational social enterprises can introduce pedagogical training for teachers, the real change will only occur if the burden of non-teaching duties is alleviated. Reducing these responsibilities would allow teachers to focus on what matters most: delivering quality education tailored to each student.

The Misplaced Blame on the Abolition of UPSR

Another issue the documentary touches on is the perceived decline in student motivation and academic performance following the abolition of the Ujian Pencapaian Sekolah Rendah (UPSR) examination. This sentiment has become a nationwide fallacy, embraced by many who are concerned about the state of Malaysian education. However, blaming the abolition of UPSR as the root cause of these issues is simplistic and overlooks deeper structural problems.

The decline in student motivation and performance cannot be attributed to the absence of an exam alone. Factors such as family background, socioeconomic challenges, access to learning opportunities outside the classroom, and teacher competencies play a far more significant role in shaping student outcomes. By focusing on these broader issues, we can work toward solutions that genuinely improve educational outcomes, rather than resorting to exam-based quick fixes.

Class Sizes and Urban Planning: The Need for Sustainable Solutions

The documentary also raises concerns about large class sizes in government schools, where an average class has between 30-35 students. Such numbers make it difficult for teachers to sustain engaging and interactive activities that cater to individual learning needs. While an obvious solution might be to allocate more funding for building additional schools, this challenge is also intricately linked to urban planning issues.

Addressing the problem of overcrowded classrooms requires a more holistic approach, including better urban planning and infrastructure development. Creating a conducive learning environment means ensuring that students have access to well-resourced schools in their communities, which requires a coordinated effort between the education sector and urban planners.

Teacher absenteeism: More than one facet

The documentary touched on the issue of teacher absenteeism. The campaign led by Tiada Guru is a nationwide initiative aimed at raising awareness about teachers who deliberately do not attend classes, which is an issue that affects student learning. However, another aspect to consider is that some teachers are absent because they need to attend to formal duties outside of school. This is something that viewers should also be cognizant of when it comes to 'teacher absenteeism.'

The Politics of Education Policymaking

Lastly, the documentary touches on the role of politics in education policymaking, suggesting that decisions are often driven by ideological and personal agendas rather than policy values and public interest. The Dual Language Program (DLP) and time allocated for religious classes were some of the policies mentioned in this documentary. This observation is indeed a crucial point that deserves more attention. While political dynamics inevitably play a role in shaping education policies, it is essential that decision-making processes prioritize responsible, evidence-based choices that serve the best interests of the public.

The core message of the documentary—that our education policies are sometimes influenced by individual politicians' values and party ideologies rather than broader public interest—is valid. However, this is precisely the area where change is needed. Education policy should be guided by research, data, and the lived experiences of those who work within the system, rather than being swayed by partisan agendas.

Conclusion

While the documentary attempts to highlight the political entanglements hindering Malaysia's education reforms, it misses the opportunity to delve into the more pressing structural issues that teachers and students face daily. True reform requires addressing the overwhelming administrative load on teachers, moving beyond simplistic narratives around standardized testing, and creating sustainable solutions for class size and infrastructure challenges. Most importantly, education policymaking should be rooted in evidence-based practices and the genuine needs of students and educators, rather than being subject to political whims. Only by tackling these core issues can Malaysia hope to achieve an education system that serves the diverse needs of its learners and prepares them for a rapidly changing world.

Comments